cv-diffusion-efficiency
Computer VisionCFGpp-mainrigorous codebase
Description
Diffusion Model: Sampler Efficiency Optimization
Objective
Design an efficient sampling algorithm for text-to-image diffusion models that achieves high generation quality with minimal sampling steps (NFE).
Background
Diffusion models generate images by iteratively denoising from random noise. Different sampling methods have different trade-offs:
- DDIM: First-order ODE solver, deterministic, fast but may need more steps for quality
- Euler: Simple first-order method, baseline performance
- DPM++ 2M: Second-order multistep method, more efficient
- DPM++ 2S: Second-order singlestep method, higher quality per step
The core sampling loop follows this pattern:
for step, t in enumerate(timesteps):
# 1. Predict noise
noise_pred = model(zt, t, text_embedding)
# 2. Estimate clean image (Tweedie's formula)
z0t = (zt - sigma_t * noise_pred) / alpha_t
# 3. Update to next step (THIS IS THE KEY DIFFERENCE)
zt_next = update_rule(zt, z0t, noise_pred, t, t_next)
Different samplers use different update_rule strategies.
Task
Your goal is to design an improved sampling update rule that achieves better image-text alignment (CLIP score) with a fixed budget of NFE=20 steps. You must implement your improvement in two files:
latent_diffusion.py—BaseDDIMCFGppclass for SD v1.5latent_sdxl.py—BaseDDIMCFGppclass for SDXL
Editable Regions
SD v1.5 (latent_diffusion.py, lines 621-679)
- Class
BaseDDIMCFGpp(StableDiffusion)withsample()method - Key API:
self.get_text_embed(),self.initialize_latent(),self.predict_noise(),self.alpha(t)
SDXL (latent_sdxl.py, lines 713-755)
- Class
BaseDDIMCFGpp(SDXL)withreverse_process()method - Key API:
self.initialize_latent(size=...),self.predict_noise(),self.scheduler.alphas_cumprod[t]
Evaluation
- Metric: CLIP score (cosine similarity between generated image and text prompt)
- Fixed budget: NFE=20 steps
- Test prompts: 100 diverse COCO-style prompts
- Seeds: Multi-seed evaluation
Baselines
- ddim: Standard DDIM sampler (first-order)
- dpm2m: DPM++ 2M sampler (second-order multistep)
- dpm2s: DPM++ 2S sampler (second-order singlestep)
Your implementation should aim to achieve higher CLIP scores than all baselines with the same NFE=20 budget.
Code
Results
| Model | Type | fid sd15 ↓ | fid sd20 ↓ | fid sdxl ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ddim | baseline | 34.230 | 28.410 | 51.520 |
| dpm2s | baseline | 29.020 | 23.890 | 42.830 |
| dpm3m_sde | baseline | 27.940 | 23.450 | 41.500 |
| anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | vanilla | 642.933 | - | - |
| deepseek-reasoner | vanilla | 642.933 | 642.933 | - |
| google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview | vanilla | 31.470 | 25.576 | - |
| qwen/qwen3.6-plus | vanilla | 642.933 | 642.933 | - |
| anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | agent | 35.450 | 30.000 | 55.000 |
| deepseek-reasoner | agent | 406.160 | 407.090 | FAIL |
| google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview | agent | 30.920 | 25.190 | 45.200 |
| qwen/qwen3.6-plus | agent | 642.930 | 642.930 | FAIL |