Agent Conversation: gpt-5.4

Model: gpt-5.4
Total steps: 7
Messages: 16
UserStep 0

Task: llm-pretrain-lr-schedule

LLM Pretraining: Learning Rate Schedule Optimization

Research Question

Design an improved learning rate schedule for GPT-2 language model pretraining. Your modifications should reduce validation loss compared to the standard cosine annealing schedule with linear warmup.

What You Can Modify

The get_lr function (lines 192-201) in custom_pretrain.py:

  • Schedule shape (default: cosine decay with linear warmup)
  • Warmup strategy and duration
  • Decay behavior (shape, rate, final LR)
  • Multi-phase scheduling (e.g., warmup-stable-decay)

Note: The function signature get_lr(it, warmup_iters, lr_decay_iters, learning_rate, min_lr) must be preserved. The training loop calls this function at every iteration to set the learning rate.

Evaluation

  • Metric: Validation loss (cross-entropy, lower is better), plus perplexity (WikiText-2, LAMBADA) and downstream accuracy (ARC-Easy, HellaSwag, PIQA, WinoGrande)
  • Model: GPT-2 Medium (24L/16H/1024D, ~355M params)
  • Dataset: FineWeb 10B (GPT-2 tokenizer), ~7.1B tokens (D=20N Chinchilla-optimal)
  • Training: 12030 iterations, BSZ=96, GA=6, 2-GPU DDP
  • Hardware: H200 GPU

nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py [EDITABLE — lines 191–201, lines 245–247 only]

     1: """Custom GPT-2 Pretraining Script
     2: Based on Andrej Karpathy's nanoGPT, evaluated on FineWeb dataset.
     3: """
     4: 
     5: import math
     6: import inspect
     7: import os
     8: import time
     9: from contextlib import nullcontext
    10: from dataclasses import dataclass
    11: 
    12: import numpy as np
    13: import torch
    14: import torch.nn as nn
    15: from torch.nn import functional as F
    16: 
    17: # ============================================================================
    18: # Model Components
    19: # ============================================================================
    20: 
    21: # ── Normalization ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
    22: class LayerNorm(nn.Module):
    23:     """LayerNorm but with an optional bias."""
    24:     def __init__(self, ndim, bias):
    25:         super().__init__()
    26:         self.weight = nn.Parameter(torch.ones(ndim))
    27:         self.bias = nn.Parameter(torch.zeros(ndim)) if bias else None
    28: 
    29:     def forward(self, input):
    30:         return F.layer_norm(input, self.weight.shape, self.weight, self.bias, 1e-5)
    31: 
    32: # ── Self-Attention ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
    33: class CausalSelfAttention(nn.Module):
    34:     def __init__(self, config):
    35:         super().__init__()
    36:         assert config.n_embd % config.n_head == 0
    37:         self.c_attn = nn.Linear(config.n_embd, 3 * config.n_embd, bias=config.bias)
    38:         self.c_proj = nn.Linear(config.n_embd, config.n_embd, bias=config.bias)
    39:         self.attn_dropout = nn.Dropout(config.dropout)
    40:     
AssistantStep 1edit
Tool Input
1{
2  "op": "replace",
3  "filename": "nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py",
4  "start_line": 191,
5  "end_line": 201,
6  "content": "def get_lr(it, warmup_iters, lr_decay_iters, learning_rate, min_lr):\n    \"\"\"Warmup-Hold-Delayed-Cosine with polynomial tail-smoothing.\n\n    Motivation:\n    - GPT pretraining often benefits from spending most of training near the peak LR.\n    - A very early cosine decay can under-train later tokens at this compute budget.\n    - A pure plateau + abrupt linear tail can decay too aggressively near the end.\n\n    Schedule:\n    1) warmup: linear ramp\n    2) hold: constant peak LR until 70% of training\n    3) transition: gentle cosine anneal from 70%->90%\n    4) tail: flattened quadratic approach to min_lr from 90%->100%\n    \"\"\"\n    if it < warmup_iters:\n        return learning_rate * (it + 1) / (warmup_iters + 1)\n    if it >= lr_decay_iters:\n        return min_lr\n\n    hold_end = max(warmup_iters + 1, int(lr_decay_iters * 0.70))\n    tail_start = max(hold_end + 1, int(lr_decay_iters * 0.90))\n\n    if it < hold_end:\n        return learning_rate\n\n    if it < tail_start:\n        t = (it - hold_end) / (tail_start - hold_end)\n        coeff = 0.5 * (1.0 + math.cos(math.pi * t))\n        mid_lr = min_lr + 0.35 * (learning_rate - min_lr)\n        return mid_lr + coeff * (learning_rate - mid_lr)\n\n    t = (it - tail_start) / (lr_decay_iters - tail_start)\n    start_tail_lr = min_lr + 0.35 * (learning_rate - min_lr)\n    coeff = (1.0 - t) ** 2\n    return min_lr + coeff * (start_tail_lr - min_lr)"
7}
Tool ResultStep 1
OK: Replaced lines 191..201 with 35 line(s) in nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py. Editable range: 191–225, 269–271.

[Current file: nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py | editable: 191–225, 269–271 | total: 461 lines]
   191  def get_lr(it, warmup_iters, lr_decay_iters, learning_rate, min_lr):
   192      """Warmup-Hold-Delayed-Cosine with polynomial tail-smoothing.
   193  
       ... (29 more lines) ...
   223      start_tail_lr = min_lr + 0.35 * (learning_rate - min_lr)
   224      coeff = (1.0 - t) ** 2
   225      return min_lr + coeff * (start_tail_lr - min_lr)
...
   269      # CONFIG_OVERRIDES: override training hyperparameters for your method.
   270      # Allowed keys: learning_rate, weight_decay, warmup_iters, min_lr, grad_clip.
   271      CONFIG_OVERRIDES = {}
AssistantStep 2edit
Tool Input
1{
2  "op": "replace",
3  "filename": "nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py",
4  "start_line": 269,
5  "end_line": 271,
6  "content": "# CONFIG_OVERRIDES: override training hyperparameters for your method.\n    # Allowed keys: learning_rate, weight_decay, warmup_iters, min_lr, grad_clip.\n    CONFIG_OVERRIDES = {'warmup_iters': int(max_iters * 0.02), 'min_lr': learning_rate / 20}"
7}
Tool ResultStep 2
OK: Replaced lines 269..271 with 3 line(s) in nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py. Editable range: 191–225, 269–271.

[Current file: nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py | editable: 191–225, 269–271 | total: 461 lines]
   191  def get_lr(it, warmup_iters, lr_decay_iters, learning_rate, min_lr):
   192      """Warmup-Hold-Delayed-Cosine with polynomial tail-smoothing.
   193  
       ... (29 more lines) ...
   223      start_tail_lr = min_lr + 0.35 * (learning_rate - min_lr)
   224      coeff = (1.0 - t) ** 2
   225      return min_lr + coeff * (start_tail_lr - min_lr)
...
   269  # CONFIG_OVERRIDES: override training hyperparameters for your method.
   270      # Allowed keys: learning_rate, weight_decay, warmup_iters, min_lr, grad_clip.
   271      CONFIG_OVERRIDES = {'warmup_iters': int(max_iters * 0.02), 'min_lr': learning_rate / 20}
AssistantStep 3test
Tool ResultStep 3
[Test #1] (2 tests remaining; call submit(n=N) to choose which test result to submit as final)

### gpt-345m (scripts/gpt_345m.sh)
Training metrics (last steps):
TRAIN_METRICS: step=8000, train_loss=2.6885, val_loss=2.4088
TRAIN_METRICS: step=9000, train_loss=2.6500, val_loss=2.3737
TRAIN_METRICS: step=10000, train_loss=2.6085, val_loss=2.3309
TRAIN_METRICS: step=11000, train_loss=2.5617, val_loss=2.2813
TRAIN_METRICS: step=12000, train_loss=2.5378, val_loss=2.2603
Final metrics (gpt-345m): val_loss_gpt-345m=2.2538, wikitext2_ppl_gpt-345m=41.8200, lambada_ppl_gpt-345m=66.1400

### lm-eval-345m (scripts/lm_eval_345m.sh)
Final metrics (lm-eval-345m): arc_easy_lm-eval-345m=55.5600, hellaswag_lm-eval-345m=34.0300, piqa_lm-eval-345m=64.2000, winogrande_lm-eval-345m=52.1700

[Leaderboard] Results saved: {'val_loss_gpt-345m': 2.2538, 'wikitext2_ppl_gpt-345m': 41.82, 'lambada_ppl_gpt-345m': 66.14, 'elapsed_gpt-345m': 19964, 'arc_easy_lm-eval-345m': 55.56, 'hellaswag_lm-eval-345m': 34.03, 'piqa
AssistantStep 4edit
Tool Input
1{
2  "op": "replace",
3  "filename": "nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py",
4  "start_line": 191,
5  "end_line": 225,
6  "content": "def get_lr(it, warmup_iters, lr_decay_iters, learning_rate, min_lr):\n    \"\"\"Adaptive 3-phase schedule with sqrt warmup and long cosine tail.\n\n    Novelty:\n    - concave sqrt warmup reaches useful LR faster than linear warmup,\n      reducing under-training early in short-to-mid budget pretraining\n    - explicit short hold phase stabilizes optimization near the peak LR\n    - long cosine decay over the final 35% avoids both overlong plateau and\n      the overly sharp late collapse of linear cooldowns\n    \"\"\"\n    if it < warmup_iters:\n        t = (it + 1) / (warmup_iters + 1)\n        return learning_rate * math.sqrt(t)\n    if it >= lr_decay_iters:\n        return min_lr\n\n    hold_end = max(warmup_iters + 1, int(lr_decay_iters * 0.65))\n    if it < hold_end:\n        return learning_rate\n\n    t = (it - hold_end) / (lr_decay_iters - hold_end)\n    coeff = 0.5 * (1.0 + math.cos(math.pi * t))\n    floor = min_lr + 0.10 * (learning_rate - min_lr)\n    return floor + coeff * (learning_rate - floor)"
7}
Tool ResultStep 4
OK: Replaced lines 191..225 with 24 line(s) in nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py. Editable range: 191–214, 258–260.

[Current file: nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py | editable: 191–214, 258–260 | total: 450 lines]
   191  def get_lr(it, warmup_iters, lr_decay_iters, learning_rate, min_lr):
   192      """Adaptive 3-phase schedule with sqrt warmup and long cosine tail.
   193  
       ... (18 more lines) ...
   212      coeff = 0.5 * (1.0 + math.cos(math.pi * t))
   213      floor = min_lr + 0.10 * (learning_rate - min_lr)
   214      return floor + coeff * (learning_rate - floor)
...
   258  # CONFIG_OVERRIDES: override training hyperparameters for your method.
   259      # Allowed keys: learning_rate, weight_decay, warmup_iters, min_lr, grad_clip.
   260      CONFIG_OVERRIDES = {'warmup_iters': int(max_iters * 0.02), 'min_lr': learning_rate / 20}
AssistantStep 5edit
Tool Input
1{
2  "op": "replace",
3  "filename": "nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py",
4  "start_line": 258,
5  "end_line": 260,
6  "content": "# CONFIG_OVERRIDES: override training hyperparameters for your method.\n    # Allowed keys: learning_rate, weight_decay, warmup_iters, min_lr, grad_clip.\n    CONFIG_OVERRIDES = {'warmup_iters': int(max_iters * 0.03), 'min_lr': learning_rate / 25}"
7}
Tool ResultStep 5
OK: Replaced lines 258..260 with 3 line(s) in nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py. Editable range: 191–214, 258–260.

[Current file: nanoGPT/custom_pretrain.py | editable: 191–214, 258–260 | total: 450 lines]
   191  def get_lr(it, warmup_iters, lr_decay_iters, learning_rate, min_lr):
   192      """Adaptive 3-phase schedule with sqrt warmup and long cosine tail.
   193  
       ... (18 more lines) ...
   212      coeff = 0.5 * (1.0 + math.cos(math.pi * t))
   213      floor = min_lr + 0.10 * (learning_rate - min_lr)
   214      return floor + coeff * (learning_rate - floor)
...
   258  # CONFIG_OVERRIDES: override training hyperparameters for your method.
   259      # Allowed keys: learning_rate, weight_decay, warmup_iters, min_lr, grad_clip.
   260      CONFIG_OVERRIDES = {'warmup_iters': int(max_iters * 0.03), 'min_lr': learning_rate / 25}
AssistantStep 6test
Tool ResultStep 6
[Test #2] (1 test remaining; call submit(n=N) to choose which test result to submit as final)

### gpt-345m (scripts/gpt_345m.sh)
Training metrics (last steps):
TRAIN_METRICS: step=8000, train_loss=2.6917, val_loss=2.4109
TRAIN_METRICS: step=9000, train_loss=2.6477, val_loss=2.3742
TRAIN_METRICS: step=10000, train_loss=2.6129, val_loss=2.3370
TRAIN_METRICS: step=11000, train_loss=2.5636, val_loss=2.2854
TRAIN_METRICS: step=12000, train_loss=2.5474, val_loss=2.2722
Final metrics (gpt-345m): val_loss_gpt-345m=2.2645, wikitext2_ppl_gpt-345m=42.1600, lambada_ppl_gpt-345m=66.2000

### lm-eval-345m (scripts/lm_eval_345m.sh)
Final metrics (lm-eval-345m): arc_easy_lm-eval-345m=57.1100, hellaswag_lm-eval-345m=33.8500, piqa_lm-eval-345m=62.7900, winogrande_lm-eval-345m=51.7800

[Leaderboard] Results saved: {'val_loss_gpt-345m': 2.2645, 'wikitext2_ppl_gpt-345m': 42.16, 'lambada_ppl_gpt-345m': 66.2, 'elapsed_gpt-345m': 20264, 'arc_easy_lm-eval-345m': 57.11, 'hellaswag_lm-eval-345m': 33.85, 'piqa_l
AssistantStep 7submit
Tool Input
1{
2  "n": 1
3}
Tool ResultStep 7
[submit] Submitting result from test #1 as final.

### gpt-345m (scripts/gpt_345m.sh)
Training metrics (last steps):
TRAIN_METRICS: step=8000, train_loss=2.6885, val_loss=2.4088
TRAIN_METRICS: step=9000, train_loss=2.6500, val_loss=2.3737
TRAIN_METRICS: step=10000, train_loss=2.6085, val_loss=2.3309
TRAIN_METRICS: step=11000, train_loss=2.5617, val_loss=2.2813
TRAIN_METRICS: step=12000, train_loss=2.5378, val_loss=2.2603
Final metrics (gpt-345m): val_loss_gpt-345m=2.2538, wikitext2_ppl_gpt-345m=41.8200, lambada_ppl_gpt-345m=66.1400

### lm-eval-345m (scripts/lm_eval_345m.sh)
Final metrics (lm-eval-345m): arc_easy_lm-eval-345m=55.5600, hellaswag_lm-eval-345m=34.0300, piqa_lm-eval-345m=64.2000, winogrande_lm-eval-345m=52.1700

[submit] Finalized test #1 as final.

[Leaderboard] Results saved: {'val_loss_gpt-345m': 2.2538, 'wikitext2_ppl_gpt-345m': 41.82, 'lambada_ppl_gpt-345m': 66.14, 'elapsed_gpt-345m': 19964, 'arc_easy_lm-eval-345m': 55.56, 'hellaswag_lm-eval-345m': 34.03, 'piqa_lm-eva